Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 12 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Final Project Rubric RDLA267 FOR USE WITH PEER REVIEW (1)
Final Project Rubric RDLA267 FOR USE WITH PEER REVIEW (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts  
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Completion and Timeliness
threshold: pts
Neither Complete nor on Time
0.0 pts
pts
2.0 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Narrative Analysis of Student
threshold: pts
Learner provides a comprehensive description of the student's learning development, including five or more learning goals supported by references to course readings.
4.0 pts
Learner provides a detailed description of the student's learning development, including four learning goals supported by references to course readings.
3.0 pts
Learner does not provide a detailed description of the student's learning development and/or includes three or fewer learning goals supported by references to course readings.
1.0 pts
pts
4.0 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis of Student Work
threshold: pts
Learner uses the specified chart to do a comprehensive analysis of the student's spelling and writing. Comments in each of the cells describe in detail what the learner observes the student is doing correctly, is confused by, and needs. The cells contain sufficient detail to understand the implications of the observations.
6.0 pts
Learner uses the specified chart to analyze the student's spelling and writing. Comments in each of the cells adequately describe what the learner observes the student is doing correctly, is confused by, and needs.
4.0 pts
Learner does not adequately use the specified chart to analyze the student's spelling and writing. Not all of the cells are filled, and/or the cells do not contain sufficient detail.
2.0 pts
pts
6.0 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Outline of instructional plan
threshold: pts
Learner describes a detailed one-week instructional plan that includes comprehensive coverage of spelling skills directly linked to the analysis of student's writing samples. The lesson plan is submitted using the lesson plan template, and contains detailed comments for each cell. The lesson plan incorporates creative applications of reading, writing, ongoing assessment, and research-based instructional practices that incorporate modeling, guided practice, and independent practice. The lesson plan includes a rationale for the selection of specific learning activities drawn from course readings.
6.0 pts
Learner describes a detailed one-week instructional plan that includes comprehensive coverage of spelling skills directly linked to the analysis of student's writing samples. The lesson plan is submitted using the lesson plan template, and contains detailed comments for each cell. The lesson plan incorporates reading, writing, ongoing assessment, and research-based instructional practices that incorporate modeling, guided practice, and independent practice.
4.0 pts
Learner describes a one-week instructional plan that may or may not link spelling skills to the analysis of student's writing samples. The lesson plan may or may not use the lesson plan template and may not contain detailed comments for each cell. The lesson plan does not incorporate all of the following: reading, writing, ongoing assessment, and research-based instructional practices that incorporate modeling, guided practice, and independent practice.
2.0 pts
pts
6.0 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reflection on Change
threshold: pts
Learner provides a clear description of instructional changes and supports the changes with relevant references to course readings and a clear statement about his/her pedagogical beliefs. Learner links the changes to specific learning needs of students and to specific curriculum standards by providing examples of how the changes will meet the learning needs of a variety of students
4.0 pts
Learner describes instructional changes and supports them with specific references to course readings and pedagogical beliefs. The learner links the changes to student's needs and to curriculum standards.
3.0 pts
Learner does not mention instructional changes with sufficient description to understand the scope or direction of the change. Minimal support is provided from the course readings and/or a statement about the learner's pedagogical beliefs. Little connection is made to student's learning needs or curriculum standards.
1.0 pts
pts
4.0 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Peer Review...for facilitator use on Final Draft
threshold: pts
Learner makes insightful suggestions for improvement to two other learner based on the peer review guidelines and assessment rubric.
4.0 pts
Learner provides constructive feedback on two other learners' work based on the peer review guidelines and assessment rubric.
3.0 pts
Learner provides constructive feedback on two other learners' work mostly based on the peer review guidelines and assessment rubric.
2.0 pts
Learner provides feedback lacking suggestions to only one other learner, or fails to follow the peer review guidelines and assessment rubric.
1.0 pts
Learner fails to provide constructive feedback to another learner based on the peer review guidelines and assessment rubric.
0.0 pts
pts
4.0 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Incorporation of peer review...for facilitator use on Final Draft
threshold: pts
Learner incorporates the suggestions from the peer review into the final lesson plan.
4.0 pts
pts
4.0 pts
--
Total Points: 30.0 out of 30.0